Bombay High Court Intervenes in Planned "Rail Roko Andolan" to Safeguard Public Interest

Court Directs Authorities to Ensure Citizen Safety Amid Proposed Protest, Respondent Cancels Andolan

In a significant development, the Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench, led by Justice Rajnish R. Vyas, has taken suo motu cognizance of a proposed "Rail Roko Andolan" that was anticipated to disrupt law and order. The court initiated Public Interest Litigation to address concerns over potential disturbances to public transport and the safety of citizens.

The court was informed of plans by respondent Mr. Omprakash Babarao Kadu alias Bachchu Kadu to organize a "Rail Roko Andolan" if discussions with authorities did not progress as planned. This prompted the court to preemptively issue notices to several authorities, including the Ministry of Railways and various railway security divisions, instructing them to become party respondents in the matter.

Emphasizing the need for coordinated action, the court directed the police, railway departments, and local administration to work collectively to ensure public safety and prevent any inconvenience to citizens. The court's directive underscores the need for authorities to act proactively to avoid disruptions to both road and rail transport.

In a positive turn, Advocate Hariom Dhage, representing respondent No. 1, informed the court that Mr. Kadu had decided to cancel the planned protest. The court accepted this decision as an official undertaking, praising the respondent's gesture as exemplary.

The court's proactive measures highlight the judiciary's role in maintaining public order and protecting citizen rights amidst potential disruptions. Further proceedings in the matter are scheduled for October 31, 2025.

Bottom Line:

Public interest litigation initiated suo motu by the Court to address law and order issues arising from proposed "Rail Roko Andolan" by respondent No. 1. Court directed authorities to ensure safety and rights of citizens, maintain smooth functioning of road and rail transport, and prevent inconvenience to the public.

Statutory provision(s): None explicitly mentioned in the judgment.

Court On Its Own Motion v. Mr. Omprakash Babarao Kadu alias Bachchu Kadu, (Bombay)(Nagpur Bench) : Law Finder Doc Id # 2801439